Any Nickelback fans out there?
Posted: June 29, 2004, 1:26 pm
more like creed part 3002882, every fucking new band that gets radio play all sound exactly the same... its like some dude in a garage somewhere made one song and the whole music industry is recycling it.Xouqoa wrote:roooooooooooooooofls
Creed part two?
Oh, I dunno. I don't listen to the radio, I'm a snob.Stragi wrote:more like creed part 3002882, every fucking new band that gets radio play all sound exactly the same... its like some dude in a garage somewhere made one song and the whole music industry is recycling it.Xouqoa wrote:roooooooooooooooofls
Creed part two?
I cried the day Soundgarden broke up. That day was a turning point in rock n roll history....but hope was not lost! That is, until Layne Staley killed himself, snuffing out any dreams of Alice and Chains finally getting there shit together, and doing something.masteen wrote:The "grunge revolution" was great when it was lead by bands like Soundgarden and Nirvana. Now it's the fucks in the recording industry are shoveling out shit like this in the same manner boy bands are made.
oh god. Wait...you're the one who hates Jim Morrison's voice!Siji wrote:There's a bunch of songs by Nickleback that I like, same with Limp Biz and even NSync or JT's solo cd.. They're mixed in my mp3 list with old Metallica, Jessica Simpson, Pantera, Garth Brooks, Anthrax, Backstreet Boys, Aerosmith, Clara Ponty, etc..
People spend way too much time hating bands. Almost any group, artist, puppet has the potential to release a decent song.
Soundgarden is good, I used to like Nirvana a lot but after listening to some of there songs recently, i realize that they spew the same exact horseshit as creed and nickelback. That and Cobain sounds like hes about to OD everytime he opens his mouth to sing a lyric. They do not have much intrumental skill at all, hell they prided themselves on that fact, that they could be so big sounding like complete bullshit.masteen wrote:The "grunge revolution" was great when it was lead by bands like Soundgarden and Nirvana. Now it's the fucks in the recording industry are shoveling out shit like this in the same manner boy bands are made.
Nivana was revolutionary at the time just for the fact that they were doing something that nobody else was, and they made it mainstream. They were an excellent band, imo.Xzion wrote:Soundgarden is good, I used to like Nirvana a lot but after listening to some of there songs recently, i realize that they spew the same exact horseshit as creed and nickelback. That and Cobain sounds like hes about to OD everytime he opens his mouth to sing a lyric. They do not have much intrumental skill at all, hell they prided themselves on that fact, that they could be so big sounding like complete bullshit.masteen wrote:The "grunge revolution" was great when it was lead by bands like Soundgarden and Nirvana. Now it's the fucks in the recording industry are shoveling out shit like this in the same manner boy bands are made.
Sure they were revolutionary, but revolutionary in a negative sence. They opened up the gateway for "nu rock" "nu punk?" bands like Nickelback and Blink182, who just strumm a few power cords that one can learn after 3 days of gitar lessons.Xouqoa wrote:Nivana was revolutionary at the time just for the fact that they were doing something that nobody else was, and they made it mainstream. They were an excellent band, imo.Xzion wrote:Soundgarden is good, I used to like Nirvana a lot but after listening to some of there songs recently, i realize that they spew the same exact horseshit as creed and nickelback. That and Cobain sounds like hes about to OD everytime he opens his mouth to sing a lyric. They do not have much intrumental skill at all, hell they prided themselves on that fact, that they could be so big sounding like complete bullshit.masteen wrote:The "grunge revolution" was great when it was lead by bands like Soundgarden and Nirvana. Now it's the fucks in the recording industry are shoveling out shit like this in the same manner boy bands are made.
you should really read deeper into rock history than poprock.Xzion wrote:Sure they were revolutionary, but revolutionary in a negative sence. They opened up the gateway for "nu rock" "nu punk?" bands like Nickelback and Blink182, who just strumm a few power cords that one can learn after 3 days of gitar lessons.Xouqoa wrote:Nivana was revolutionary at the time just for the fact that they were doing something that nobody else was, and they made it mainstream. They were an excellent band, imo.Xzion wrote:Soundgarden is good, I used to like Nirvana a lot but after listening to some of there songs recently, i realize that they spew the same exact horseshit as creed and nickelback. That and Cobain sounds like hes about to OD everytime he opens his mouth to sing a lyric. They do not have much intrumental skill at all, hell they prided themselves on that fact, that they could be so big sounding like complete bullshit.masteen wrote:The "grunge revolution" was great when it was lead by bands like Soundgarden and Nirvana. Now it's the fucks in the recording industry are shoveling out shit like this in the same manner boy bands are made.
What good has come out of the Nirvana "revolution"?
Are you serious? Alternative Rock (for lack of a better term) would never have come to the forefront of the rock scene if not for bands such as Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Stone Temple Pilots, Alice in Chains and Soundgarden.Xzion wrote:What good has come out of the Nirvana "revolution"?
Nirvana are more "pop rock" then anything by my definition. While i agree with what you said about Soundgarden stp and Alice in Chains, i dont think nirvana belongs in that category, as far as there actual sound. Nirvana is popular for all the same reasons you listed in regards to Blink182 and Nickelback, and this new generation of "pop rock".Xouqoa wrote:Are you serious? Alternative Rock (for lack of a better term) would never have come to the forefront of the rock scene if not for bands such as Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Stone Temple Pilots, Alice in Chains and Soundgarden.Xzion wrote:What good has come out of the Nirvana "revolution"?
90% of the bands I enjoy listening to now probably would never have formed or would be entirely different if it weren't for the 'grunge revolution' in the early 90's.
Nivana didn't pave the way for Nickleback and Blink 182 (who used to be decent), corporate radio did. Blame Clear Channel if you want to blame someone for that. Why do those bands get so popular? Because that's all you fucking hear on MTV and 90% of the FM radio stations in this country. As far as those types of bands are concerned though, I consider them more pop than rock.
Xzion wrote:Nirvana are more "pop rock" then anything by my definition. While i agree with what you said about Soundgarden stp and Alice in Chains, i dont think nirvana belongs in that category, as far as there actual sound. Nirvana is popular for all the same reasons you listed in regards to Blink182 and Nickelback, and this new generation of "pop rock".Xouqoa wrote:Are you serious? Alternative Rock (for lack of a better term) would never have come to the forefront of the rock scene if not for bands such as Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Stone Temple Pilots, Alice in Chains and Soundgarden.Xzion wrote:What good has come out of the Nirvana "revolution"?
90% of the bands I enjoy listening to now probably would never have formed or would be entirely different if it weren't for the 'grunge revolution' in the early 90's.
Nivana didn't pave the way for Nickleback and Blink 182 (who used to be decent), corporate radio did. Blame Clear Channel if you want to blame someone for that. Why do those bands get so popular? Because that's all you fucking hear on MTV and 90% of the FM radio stations in this country. As far as those types of bands are concerned though, I consider them more pop than rock.
Can you argue though that Nirvana in itself didnt sound like complete horseshit?
I'm so happy.
Cause today I found my friends.
They're in my head.
I'm so ugly.
But that's ok. 'Cause so are you.
We've broke our mirrors.