Posted: October 1, 2003, 6:37 pm
page 7!
I understand that Valhall wasn't deep into elementals when the guild basically disbanded, however, I merely mentioned it for the fact that PD has largely done up to elementals on their own, and Fiends has had the crutch of those in charge knowing the strats and in positions of authority. This is clearly a benefit as much of the original cast and crew of Fiends is ex LoV, and they were practically fresh off their first solo AoW kill. Once Fiends achieved Elementals, however, I congratulate you guys on your successes, as the people you recruited, by that point, had ponied up and earned their keep.Fovol wrote:Not attacking you, just clarification:Pahreyia wrote:Be careful when coming out with this when you just posted a page or two ago about how fiends did all this content all by themselves. While it's true that Fiends has done well for themselves, it helps when you have an officer corps that had done the events prior with another guild (Valhall) and a legion of showEQ trackers. It's in bad taste and undercuts your moral high ground on this issue.suppin wrote:But anyways, just hadda say that to get you to shut the fuck up, next time if you're going to talk out your ass, try and get some facts straight.
We have currently a total of four active Valhall players. Three of whom, are in fact, officers. However, it would be ignorant to say that no other guilds have had leaders that haven't atleast once learned of the strats before (except for guilds on 'first accomplishments' every time). Not to mention, none of our Valhaller's have done many of the Elemental mobs we've thus far killed. I will give you that it did help us build a solid foundation when we were creating the guild, past that I doubt it really had much affect on the outcome of our guild.
On ShowEQ, uhm, I don't know what you're talking about.![]()
Regardless, it doesn't win fights for a user, unlike PD has for FS.
I get it! Zerging so much easier... no tactics, no stragety, no way to learn shit for yourselves. Just load up the nukes and throw everything you got at the target. And maybe if the lag gets high enough, you can exploit that too!Zaelath wrote:Glad I could amuse you, but ... what?Voronwë wrote:LOL wowZaeleth wrote:It's much easier to zerg, and the lag can work for you if it's server side, than it is to kill with the minimum numbers.
Try it in Air. I dare ya!Xanastik Fox wrote:Yea, its also uber hard to just send a SOS rogue in. Yea.
Fovol, stfu lol. You have resorted to basic 'you lack intellegence shit'. Was i defending my actions dumbass? Or was i calling you out? I made no claim to anything, and am now only defending myself, because you are utterly retarded.Fovol wrote:You, sir, lack any intelligence. If you had no pride in your actions, you wouldn't sit here and defend them.Topper wrote:what the fuck have you been smoking? Where has anyone bragged about anything fovol?Fovol wrote:I just find it funny that you find any sense of pride in your slaying of these flagging mobs.Akaran_D wrote:I just find it funny that anyone from Fiends honestly thinks that people from FS give a shit what they think of us.
You sir, are a dumbass
To Akaran: to each his own, I suppose. If you truly feel no pride an anything you have 'accomplished' (take that for what it's worth, as you said, it is just a game) in this game, then what do you feel when you beat GTA:Vice city through hours of work compared to when you run through the game with invincibility and infinite ammo codes on? I realize, that in both situations, many would have fun (atleast for awhile, it gets boring after doing it for too long), but you don't feel like you've done anything. Maybe I'm the odd one out here, but I play games for entertainment as well as a competitive interest; which you assuredly do as well or you wouldn't be allying, because you'd be content progressing slower.
As an aside, an accomplishment, is, by definition, an achievement. An achievement, is, in turn, an accomplishment by use of preserverence or skill. Farstorm, in my opinion, has generally stuck to these 'requirements', however, their slayings of flag mobs do not meet any of these requirements. They didn't win because they were skilled or because they stuck at it until they won, they won because they had another guild that has done them before hold their hands through it. I cannot tell someone what they can or cannot be proud of because of the nature of pride. It's how you feel about yourself based on your outlook of others' previous accomplishments. So, I suppose this is a losing argument for me since you'll swear 'til the end of the world that you are awesome because you killed RZtW (or whatever) 'with' PD, and since my "opinions don't matter" to you, you'll have to rely on your own self-judgement of what's legit or not. However, on the same note, I feel pride that my guild worked for everything we have (minus a total of four people that are from a higher-end guild -- holy shit), and weren't pulled through it.
Finally, I personally will respect your future accomplishments (for example, when you kill Fennin) because both sides will have had to work for it -- not coming into it already champs, but how you got there will always be, sadly, weak.
Rogues are one thing, but when a class zones in that would have ABSOLUTELY no clue as to what could be up at the far end of the zone... I.E. Necro on Yozzani.. It's pretty clear that some SEQing is going on. While the moral debate on packet sniffers can be dealt with elsewhere, the flagrant use of SEQ for tracking purposes undercuts the moral high ground that Suppin was attempting to carry fiends over. I don't dispute your successes, and grats to you guys for them. But to use SEQ in zones like elementals undercuts the difficulty and skill required to track those targets by means of rangers/druids/rogues/bards and the skill required to find out if they're even up.Xanastik Fox wrote:Yea, its also uber hard to just send a SOS rogue in. Yea.
Your analogy of PD merely "backflagging" FS as if they were apps to their guild is plain stupid.Pahreyia wrote: As far as PD taking FS through to elementals, how is that different from guild backflagging applicants or trial members? It's just the scale of the beast. No one makes a 6 page flame thread over Fiends backflagging A_Random_Player_01 up to elementals even though that person has 0 Endgame Luclin or PoP experience. Clearly that person didn't "earn" the right to be in elementals, but hey, they needed the class or the body to throw at A_Boss_Mob_08.
If it furthers PD and FS by allying up, so be it. If it costs your guild valuable mangelo woodies because you missed the mob... C'est la vie.
Right, though PoFire has only been like that a month or two, I'm sure they're working feverishly on fixing the problemSargeras wrote:I get it! Zerging so much easier... no tactics, no stragety, no way to learn shit for yourselves. Just load up the nukes and throw everything you got at the target. And maybe if the lag gets high enough, you can exploit that too!Zaelath wrote:Glad I could amuse you, but ... what?Voronwë wrote:LOL wowZaeleth wrote:It's much easier to zerg, and the lag can work for you if it's server side, than it is to kill with the minimum numbers.
FFS, PoFire is laggy already as it is. Gonna be looking forward offset Fennin AE's and 6 min disc defensive while another 100+ people are killing Quav.
I can track any named npc in any elemental plane with the exception of one, single, npc - Coirnav. We've never raided or attempted Coirnav yet. Damn, we're such cheaters!!!Pahreyia wrote:Rogues are one thing, but when a class zones in that would have ABSOLUTELY no clue as to what could be up at the far end of the zone... I.E. Necro on Yozzani.. It's pretty clear that some SEQing is going on. While the moral debate on packet sniffers can be dealt with elsewhere, the flagrant use of SEQ for tracking purposes undercuts the moral high ground that Suppin was attempting to carry fiends over. I don't dispute your successes, and grats to you guys for them. But to use SEQ in zones like elementals undercuts the difficulty and skill required to track those targets by means of rangers/druids/rogues/bards and the skill required to find out if they're even up.Xanastik Fox wrote:Yea, its also uber hard to just send a SOS rogue in. Yea.
Fovol called it playing GTA: Vice City with the codes on, I call it Starcraft / Warcraft with the map discovery cheat and fog of war off.
Zaeleth wrote:It's much easier to zerg, and the lag can work for you if it's server side, than it is to kill with the minimum numbers.
Ok, now you are confusing meZaeleth wrote:TBH I think people kill more reliably w/ 45 than with 100... people get inattentive when they think there's plenty of people to cover their ass.
And I never claimed that the achievements weren't either. I believe we agree on this fact, just by way of differing semantics.Fovol wrote:Pahreyia, I admit I skimmed your post, because you have a point and like I said, I for the most part, agree; I was just clarifying. *I* (maybe someone else did, I didn't, though) never claimed that PD's accomplishments weren't legit. Even with Farstorm's assistance, I think what they achieve is completely fair. Perhaps, it will be a target of jokes for being a large raid force, maybe not, but they get it done. I'm targeting Farstorm because they've thus far worked for jack and shit in the 'alliance'.
As I understand the program, it generates a list of every mob in the zone when you zone in, as well as a map. As I'm sure that for the purposes of saving latency, the servers wouldn't send packet information for a mob that's too far away to track, zoning into PoFire and checking the list for, and I'll use the same example, Yozzani, who is not trackable from the zone, or the Fennin script Catalyst mob negates the difficulty of sending in a rogue or ranger to track it.I don't think SEQ updates very well at long ranges, basically outside of tracking range. You need to get close to the mob that you're wishing to track to get an accurate reading, most of the time. Most stuff is trackable from the zone in anyways, but it does give said guild more potential trackers, I suppose. Again, I'm not saying we're right/wrong here, just clarifying for better judgement by you (or others).
Pah is pointing out that SEQ allows people that generally wouldn't be able to track to be able to track. It's a valid point, but I tend to disagree that it makes us a morally wrong guild for using it; like I said, it'd be ignorant to say no one has used it before. However, what FS is doing has never been done before. It's just.. uhm, dumb.Drinsic Darkwood wrote:I can track any named npc in any elemental plane with the exception of one, single, npc - Coirnav. We've never raided or attempted Coirnav yet. Damn, we're such cheaters!!!Pahreyia wrote:Rogues are one thing, but when a class zones in that would have ABSOLUTELY no clue as to what could be up at the far end of the zone... I.E. Necro on Yozzani.. It's pretty clear that some SEQing is going on. While the moral debate on packet sniffers can be dealt with elsewhere, the flagrant use of SEQ for tracking purposes undercuts the moral high ground that Suppin was attempting to carry fiends over. I don't dispute your successes, and grats to you guys for them. But to use SEQ in zones like elementals undercuts the difficulty and skill required to track those targets by means of rangers/druids/rogues/bards and the skill required to find out if they're even up.Xanastik Fox wrote:Yea, its also uber hard to just send a SOS rogue in. Yea.
Fovol called it playing GTA: Vice City with the codes on, I call it Starcraft / Warcraft with the map discovery cheat and fog of war off.
Difference between a "first kill to get the flag out of the way" and being able to reliably take down a target. ie, easier to kill something without a refined strategy, but highly unreliable.Sargeras wrote:Zaeleth wrote:It's much easier to zerg, and the lag can work for you if it's server side, than it is to kill with the minimum numbers.
Ok, now you are confusing meZaeleth wrote:TBH I think people kill more reliably w/ 45 than with 100... people get inattentive when they think there's plenty of people to cover their ass.
I hate responses that point out grammar, because sometimes it can go two ways. In the english language, there are more than two ways to point out a group. Most of the time, You All would be associated when talking about plural persons, because it is more descriptive. In texas, its ya'll. Now, you can pull out your plural pronoun bullshit if you want, but the fact is: You should have been more clear while posting. You is most commonly placed with singular referances. So, stfu.Fovol wrote:You obviously do not realize that the word 'you' also can be used as a plural pronoun. I was directing it towards your guild in general. You used 'anyone', referring to your guild (or I suppose PD). I'm saying that your guild is defending the issue, and thus, has pride in their accomplishments.
Pahreyia, I admit I skimmed your post, because you have a point and like I said, I for the most part, agree; I was just clarifying. *I* (maybe someone else did, I didn't, though) never claimed that PD's accomplishments weren't legit. Even with Farstorm's assistance, I think what they achieve is completely fair. Perhaps, it will be a target of jokes for being a large raid force, maybe not, but they get it done. I'm targeting Farstorm because they've thus far worked for jack and shit in the 'alliance'.
I don't think SEQ updates very well at long ranges, basically outside of tracking range. You need to get close to the mob that you're wishing to track to get an accurate reading, most of the time. Most stuff is trackable from the zone in anyways, but it does give said guild more potential trackers, I suppose. Again, I'm not saying we're right/wrong here, just clarifying for better judgement by you (or others).
I agree with you, in principle. However, if PD chooses to form an alliance with FS and backflags them to bring their people up to the level of PDs in order to solidify the raiding force that is at the core of the alliance, I, personally, see little difference in backflagging a wave of recruits, beyond the scale.Drinsic Darkwood wrote:Your analogy of PD merely "backflagging" FS as if they were apps to their guild is plain stupid.
When a guild has progressed into the elemental stages you can't just say "hey, let's not let anyone join unless they get all the flags to this point on their own." Obviously, people come and go in a guild, and sometimes you have to get replacements - this is basic EQ guild-related knowledge. It's one thing to backflag a round of 10 applicants to your guild or whatever - it's different to backflag an entirely different guild that put no work whatsoever into getting those flags other than logging on and showing up at a raid.
And this is where I agree most with you.It's been stated repeatedly already - but where's the sense of accompishment? Where's the sense of achievement? There isn't one, and if the "alliance" continues, as it apparently will, you never can really have one since it's already been handed to you by someone. That'd put a bad taste in my mouth if my entire guild was simply walked through it all. The invicibility/ammo cheat analogy is a pretty good one. Sure it's fun, but there's no accomplishment involved.
I didn't say it was pure piggybacking of the non-Valhall people. I just attributed much of the speed by which you guys made elementals to having Valhall people in officer positions. Clearly this benefitted Fiends in a similar way that PD's raiding core is helping FS through planar progression. However, I most certainly do not mean to suggest that Fiends did not make elementals on their own. There is a difference, and I'd like to make sure that you don't assume that I don't see it. However, it's one thing to push through to elementals by your own strats and learning curve, and it's another to have officers and raid leaders who had experience with the events. I attribute this to the speed by which Fiends made elementals, not by their aptitude. And as I said, by the time you guys got elementals, there was no argument that your people didn't earn it.As for trying to say Fiends had everything "handed" to them - wowow, you're 100 percent correct omgad. We have 6 people that were in Valhall at one point, two of which is in inactive. I'm sorry but what Jice stated isn't true - 5 people knowing what they're doing along with 45 warm bodies doesn't win a higher end PoP raid for you.Not to mention that some events have changed since Valhall did them - Rallos Zek being one of them. We devised our own strategy against him, which involved thinking on our own part - not the part of some other guild.
Yes, I know. My point is, however, that just tossing a necro into the zone, seeing what's up and calling the raid requires negligable skill versus zoning in a ranger/druid/rogue/bard and having them make their way to a tracking position. There's inherently risk involved and skill required, and by using SEQ you circumvent that. Again, merely a statement to argue the moral authority of the position.Drinsic Darkwood wrote:I can track any named npc in any elemental plane with the exception of one, single, npc - Coirnav. We've never raided or attempted Coirnav yet. Damn, we're such cheaters!!!Pahreyia wrote:Rogues are one thing, but when a class zones in that would have ABSOLUTELY no clue as to what could be up at the far end of the zone... I.E. Necro on Yozzani.. It's pretty clear that some SEQing is going on. While the moral debate on packet sniffers can be dealt with elsewhere, the flagrant use of SEQ for tracking purposes undercuts the moral high ground that Suppin was attempting to carry fiends over. I don't dispute your successes, and grats to you guys for them. But to use SEQ in zones like elementals undercuts the difficulty and skill required to track those targets by means of rangers/druids/rogues/bards and the skill required to find out if they're even up.Xanastik Fox wrote:Yea, its also uber hard to just send a SOS rogue in. Yea.
Fovol called it playing GTA: Vice City with the codes on, I call it Starcraft / Warcraft with the map discovery cheat and fog of war off.
Sorry if I wasn't clear enough.. I don't mean to suggest the the guild is not morally right or wrong.Fovol wrote:Pah is pointing out that SEQ allows people that generally wouldn't be able to track to be able to track. It's a valid point, but I tend to disagree that it makes us a morally wrong guild for using it; like I said, it'd be ignorant to say no one has used it before. However, what FS is doing has never been done before. It's just.. uhm, dumb.
Incorrect, for the record, I can track every mob inside PoFire from zone in. Guardian of Doomfire, and Arch Mage Yozanni included.Pahreyia wrote:I'll use the same example, Yozzani, who is not trackable from the zone, or the Fennin script Catalyst mob negates the difficulty of sending in a rogue or ranger to track it.
If that's the case, then I stand corrected.Drinsic Darkwood wrote:Incorrect, for the record, I can track every mob inside PoFire from zone in. Guardian of Doomfire, and Arch Mage Yozanni included.Pahreyia wrote:I'll use the same example, Yozzani, who is not trackable from the zone, or the Fennin script Catalyst mob negates the difficulty of sending in a rogue or ranger to track it.
I agree 100%...but this is the FlameVault...and 'tis where idiots like to come and swing their cocks around...tiny cocks swinging in the VV breeze.Every guild also has its idiots most of whom seem to post here myself included. But every guild also has its share of skilled decent players just because you hate their guild tag is no reason to judge each individual that way.
The Kitty > allPsyloche wrote:After a while I just stopped reading, it got boring. I just kept seeing how many more posts til I see that stupid cat on the left side of my screen.
ex valhall:Pahreyia wrote:I didn't say it was pure piggybacking of the non-Valhall people. I just attributed much of the speed by which you guys made elementals to having Valhall people in officer positions. Clearly this benefitted Fiends in a similar way that PD's raiding core is helping FS through planar progression. However, I most certainly do not mean to suggest that Fiends did not make elementals on their own. There is a difference, and I'd like to make sure that you don't assume that I don't see it. However, it's one thing to push through to elementals by your own strats and learning curve, and it's another to have officers and raid leaders who had experience with the events. I attribute this to the speed by which Fiends made elementals, not by their aptitude. And as I said, by the time you guys got elementals, there was no argument that your people didn't earn it.
This was not a flame, and I did not mean to call you out. You guys have all the respect you deserve for what you've done. I merely clarified that Suppin's arguments from moral positions were not being generated from the highest moral authority, and provided small, factual examples to back up my claims.
90% of the time you're going to know the strat anyways, though. Unless you're at the top of the game, maybe, but by the time lower guilds get their shot at it the level four woodelves in PoK are trading strats to Quarm for Temperance. Although, I'll give you that experience does help, but the strat is easy to get.Pahreyia wrote:One... or Ten... A person with a working strat is going to make progression faster than 70 people with no idea what to expect or a working knowledge of how to accomplish the kill.
You mean WAMASS!!!!!Deneve wrote: ...ex valhall:
Wambus...
We lost like... 6 toons?... 2 chars = 1 person, and like some others... heh imo better without them... Wish them luck with their "new" guild!!Pahreyia wrote:Fiends just lost a good number of people
Our roster may have an "active" list of 91, but when we log in every night to raid, we are lucky to even see 50-60 online for a target. But you wouldn't know that would you?[/quote]Sargeras wrote:
What's the secret plan? Just boot people that don't log on?balance will be created reguardless of counting on attrition by normal means or not
What's the secret plan?
j00 know wamb from somewhere? he's a RL friend of mine, almost all of my EQ playing has been at his house...though it looks like he is quiting EQ nowStalker Vacio wrote:You mean WAMASS!!!!!Deneve wrote: ...ex valhall:
Wambus...
Jackas!!Zastlyn wrote:Xyun's SC zerg pics own at life~
And in one sentence, by one person responsible, it is all summed up.Trias wrote:PD has in fact flagged FS on content they have not yet killed obviously
Ben stiller is bombing at the movies lately, EXPLAIN THAT Mr. Zoolander!Sargeras wrote:so?
You started rofl.Trias wrote:nm, not even gonna play this kid game crap
There's an afterparty?Proctus wrote:Ben stiller is bombing at the movies lately, EXPLAIN THAT Mr. Zoolander!