Girl types....

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » June 3, 2003, 3:58 pm

To me each of these terms means something different....it's hard to really describe it as it's more of a feeling inside then a visible quality....but I'll try and describe it in terms of clothing....but it's more then clothing, it's thier personality, thier face, thier body....but that's too hard to put to words so I think you will get the idea via clothing.

Cute is a girl that looks best in like a T-shirt and jeans.

Pretty is a girl who looks best in say clothes you would wear to meet someones family.

Beautiful is a woman who looks best in that strapless evening dress.

Sexy is a girl who looks best in like club-wear.

I mean they can wear anything and look good.....but when they wear this type outfit it just clicks...that is them.

I included a standard flame option to save certain regular posters some time. Feel free to use it.

Ooga[foh] · Post by **Ooga[foh]** » June 3, 2003, 4:02 pm

Could you add sluts to the list please? I'm the first to admit I like em a bit trashy.

Thanks!

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » June 3, 2003, 4:04 pm

Try looking on the inside. That is most important.

Voronwë · Post by **Voronwë** » June 3, 2003, 4:06 pm

Cartalas wrote:Try looking on the inside. That is most important.

on the first date!?

Fairweather Pure · Post by **Fairweather Pure** » June 3, 2003, 4:06 pm

Try looking on the inside.

Like with a speculum?

Cartalas · Post by **Cartalas** » June 3, 2003, 4:06 pm

Voronwë wrote:
Cartalas wrote:Try looking on the inside. That is most important.
on the first date!?

Biting my tounge!!!!!!

Yes!

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » June 3, 2003, 4:25 pm

Like I said it's more then just clothing or looks....it's personality too.

I could try and qualify girls into those 4 groups by personality, but it's hard to do that using language, personality grouping is more of an abstract feeling in your gut.

I mean seriously how would you put that into words? If I was to even try it would a be war and peace size novel....and that's if I kept it short and to the point...which some would say isn't my strong point.

Fairweather Pure · Post by **Fairweather Pure** » June 3, 2003, 4:28 pm

Personality alone can make the most beautiful person ugly, or the ugliest person beautiful.

That's pretty goddamn profound. Someone write that one down please.

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » June 3, 2003, 4:29 pm

Also I politely refuse to put "slut" as a girl type up there....if you like sluts try and pick a category of girl you would like your slut to fall in.

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » June 3, 2003, 4:36 pm

That's correct fairweather....

That's why I didn't catagorize them by physical appearance but more by the type of clothing that you feel suits them better.

If I was going to try and do it another way...

Cute would have been like..."active and carefree, outdoorsy"
Pretty would have been more like...."movies and dinner"
Beautiful would be like..."classy"
And Sexy would be like "club hopper, concerts"

I dunno....like I said it's almost impossible for me to put that shit into words. So I tried to use clothes to describe it.

Edit: Also I hope if your dating her that you can qualify her into cute, pretty, beautiful, or sexy. She might not be to EVERYONE....but she should fall in one of those categories for YOU....her entire package should fall into one of those types when you include personality...even if she looks like jojo the monkey boy.

kyoukan · Post by **kyoukan** » June 3, 2003, 4:38 pm

Where is the "I am a stupid fucking stupid moron who is stupid and I slap stupid labels on women based on the types of clothes they wear because I am stupid" option?

Because without that option I do not think you voted correctly Pils.

Lexien · Post by **Lexien** » June 3, 2003, 4:43 pm

See a cute girl, a sexy, girl and a beautiful girl are all the same to me.

I'd probably "date" them all, at first, to find out more about their personalities. Like Fairweather said,

Personality alone can make the most beautiful person ugly, or the ugliest person beautiful.

Put an ugly girl (yes taste is relative) i won't date a girl that i am not attracted to.

Simple as that.

Acies · Post by **Acies** » June 3, 2003, 4:49 pm

Ya, seriously bro I think you should focus on the personality types and not the apparel. That being said, from a purely physical perspective I have always had a thing for beautiful women with the long skirts, good poise and innocent faces... or intelligent blondes with a badass syndrome..
/shrug

Etasi · Post by **Etasi** » June 3, 2003, 4:51 pm

This poll does not even make sense.

Lexien · Post by **Lexien** » June 3, 2003, 4:54 pm

How so?

Enlighthen me please?

Kluden · Post by **Kluden** » June 3, 2003, 5:02 pm

Many first impressions are based on "clothing" and appearance...so...the poll makes sense...pls don't make fun of me for helping out a retarded child...kthx

I said "cute". I love them girls who wear pastels and other bright colors, this screams to me: "I'm sexy underneath all this clothing, I just don't believe in stuff so tight I can't breath."

Much luv for the cute girls

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » June 3, 2003, 5:05 pm

I'd date any of them also....I just think I'd get along better with one that has more of what I feel is a "cute" feel then the other 3...because in my mind the personality I assign to that group (like I said I can't really describe it) is more like me than the others.

AKA I don't like fancy shit, I don't like clubbing...I can really like the people who enjoy that stuff, but i don't personally like it. I prefer outdoors stuff and relaxing....movies and dinner I like too but not as much.

Kyoucan, I'm not labeling women, I'm just trying to define qualities and saying what type of qualities do you like in a woman.

Like I could say...Outgoing/shy Altheltic/non-althetic...etc...it's just qualities....but if I was to list single qualities I couldn't do a poll, I'd have to do hundreds of polls...because someone can be shy AND athletic. AND a million other things....so I tried to make 4 basic sterotypes.

Edit: Removed a flame.

Etasi · Post by **Etasi** » June 3, 2003, 5:15 pm

So I'm the only one that thinks these are totally stupid categories? Okay then!

If this is really a poll about women's attire, I think you need more diverse categories. Otherwise all you're asking is, "so what kind of hot chicks do you like?!" and I fail to see the point.

Don't take this as anything but me laughing, though.

Sirensa · Post by **Sirensa** » June 3, 2003, 5:24 pm

Pilsburry your an ignorant fuck, I hope you die IRL, your never going to get a woman

You are = you're

!@#*%&^&@^~

I agree that this poll is stupid. Most females I know where a variety of different clothing depending on the occassion, and are able to look equally good in any manner of attire. Although I realize you were over-generalizing, it's still a silly way of wording your descriptions.

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » June 3, 2003, 5:30 pm

Lexien wrote:See a cute girl, a sexy, girl and a beautiful girl are all the same to me.

I'd probably "date" them all, at first, to find out more about their personalities. Like Fairweather said,
Personality alone can make the most beautiful person ugly, or the ugliest person beautiful.
Put an ugly girl (yes taste is relative) i won't date a girl that i am not attracted to.

Simple as that.

I agree with you lexien but I feel personality can actually influence the way someone looks through your eyes somewhat....ever have a friend describe a girl.....and then you meet her and your like "this can't be the new girl he was talking about..." it's because there is something about her that he sees and you can't.

Of course there are limits....but I'd say personality or facial expressions etc can easily bump a girl up a few points on your "physical appearance meter" just because if you get to realy know thier personaility and get used to some of thier flaws, you will start to see aspects of thier physical appearance you really like that you didn't see before.

I had a huge crush on this girl in college. Probably wouldn't rank much better then average on most charts....short hair, gap in her front teeth, some people said she looked like a little boy. For some reason I REALLY thought she was cute. I still do. I even thought the gap between her front teeth was cute....I think she was one of the cutest girls I have ever met.

Now granted, she wasn't ugly....she wasn't fat with tons of acne and a cleft lip....there are limits. But somethings/people grow on you.

Post by **Sylvus** » June 3, 2003, 5:35 pm

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD PLEASE MAKE IT STOP!!!

Sabek · Post by **Sabek** » June 3, 2003, 5:37 pm

Next will be the poll to see which type of girl you have degrade most to get sex.

Fairweather Pure · Post by **Fairweather Pure** » June 3, 2003, 5:41 pm

Belladonna has a gap in her front teeth and she's still considered one of the most popular porn stars of all time. Just thought I'd share. Thank you for reading.

Ennia · Post by **Ennia** » June 3, 2003, 5:44 pm

Pils I pity you.
Seriously.
I really hope you'd say you just reposted some poll found somewhere, but having read what you say for the past year I know it's not true.

Here's some advice: stop obsessing with looks and clothes, stop comparing women to anything really, take one girl at a time, get to know her a little so you can see if you find yourselves happy in each other's company and fucking date her

who knows maybe your future better half is that dorky looking girl in the corner of the library with glasses on and nose burried in some book on
cooking light.

Acies · Post by **Acies** » June 3, 2003, 6:15 pm

Ennia wrote:who knows maybe your future better half is that dorky looking girl in the corner of the library with glasses on and nose burried in some book on
cooking light.

I dunno, that is a pretty bad comment itself. Basically you are simply judging that girl in the corner of a library reading upon appearances, also not what is inside Ennia. She could be a truly beautiful and wonderful person that you just dismissed as a dork.

Etasi · Post by **Etasi** » June 3, 2003, 6:16 pm

I could be wrong here, but I think that was the whole point, Acies.

Acies · Post by **Acies** » June 3, 2003, 6:18 pm

If that's the case, it signals something:

I need coffee bad.

Brittney · Post by **Brittney** » June 3, 2003, 6:18 pm

Ooga[foh] wrote:Could you add sluts to the list please? I'm the first to admit I like em a bit trashy.

Thanks!

Lol dude, lets not forget Ghetto hoochies! Those are my fav... give me a hoodrat chick!

Sargeras · Post by **Sargeras** » June 3, 2003, 6:23 pm

Why is it that as of recently... the majority of Pil's posts have been about understanding (or trying to) women, attracting women, or his explanation of women? It just seems like he won't let it go.

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » June 3, 2003, 6:25 pm

You caught me....I didn't proof read, I never do...I don't even correct mispellings let alone grammer mistakes.

Yes, it is kind of a silly way of over generalizing. But I didn't want to have 500 categories....

And I didn't know how to describe the personalities without drawing even more flames....because the more information I provide the more people here will pick it apart.

Like say I said...based on entire package...which is what you get...the whole package, not just personality or looks...both both and more.

--------------------------
EXAMPLE OF A LESS GENERIC CLASSIFICATION:

1. A girl who likes what you like.

2. A girl who will do what you like, but only to be with you....not because she truly enjoys it.

3. A girl who doesn't like what you like, and you don't like what she likes but you get along well and she is hotter then the first two.
--------------------------------
You see...the more specific you get to make them equal choices you have to throw out pro's and con's...and I guarantee a lot of people would have a problem with that 3rd statement...even though it's a common compromise, the majority would not let a statement like that slide. And if they did, they wouldn't choose it on the poll, even though they might IRL.

---------------------------------

Also we had a poll about "what type of underwear do you find sexier?" a while back....if this is taken just at face value....why is this drawing more flames then that one? This is just generic regular clothes style.....not even underwear.

Easiest answer? I posted it.

---------------------------------

And I agree a woman will wear various clothes depending on the situation, but I said what fits her best....and I don't mean the cut of the clothes.....or how it goes with her specific hairstyle. I mean what she likes to wear, what her personality is like.

You can take a super model and toss her in anything and she will look good, but once you get to know them, there will be a type of clothes that "suits her better" because it's more her style. You look at her and it's just "right". You don't take a girl who loves the outdoors and toss her in an evening gown and say "that's her". But I'm sure she will wear an evening gown many times...

Take for example guys...
Flannel
Trendy
Classy
etc...

I'm a cross ....I don't wear jeans or flannel, but I don't really care what I wear as long as it's comfortable....so I'd classify myself as flannel. I like the outdoors, I'm easy going, quiet....(yes, seriously..quiet).

I'm not the type of guy you want to date if you like formal visits to art galleries and museums, I'm not your guy if you want to be trendy and go to all the bars/clubs showing me off...

I'm not saying I haven't done those things, I'm not saying I can't pull those types of things off without embarassing you or ruining your time. I'm not saying I look hot in flannel or whatever I'm wearing.

It's just that's the type of clothes I like, I feel it also represents my personality type. I also feel that is somewhat true of most people.

I hope that makes what I'm trying to do here with the poll more clear.

-----------
I have no idea who belladonna is, but I'll take your wird for it.
-----------

ennia wrote:who knows maybe your future better half is that dorky looking girl in the corner of the library with glasses on and nose burried in some book on cooking light.

Funny thing is you have me pegged so wrong.......that's the type of girl I like. Here is a clue...I'm quiet and shy IRL, I posted a lot of the thread about fitness and low-fat food, plus I have said many times people should be concerned about thier weight, I wear glasses (although not in my pictures), and I like my girls smart.

Acies · Post by **Acies** » June 3, 2003, 6:29 pm

Because he wants to get laid?

Some advice bro. There is no (I repeat, NO) psychology to women. There is no tricking them, there is no general rule. They are people. Besides (hate to break this to you), while emotially sex is wonderful beyond words, physically I get more pleasure jacking off, and I am sure that is the case for 99% of guys.

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » June 3, 2003, 6:49 pm

I'm not looking for sex. If I wanted sex I could get laid maybe in a week, not because I'm hot or anything, but just because all you have to do to get laid is find a dirty slut....and I know where to look for them.

But that's not my style, **I don't believe in casual sex**. I put astrisks around it because it's like the 10th time I've stated it on VV and still 99% of the flames are regarding me wanting to get laid and it's not the case.

I won't discuss jacking off....but what I will say is, sex by itself is not reason to deal with the hassle of trying to find the right woman. Because like you said, if you want to get your rocks off there is lways a real easy alternative that has like 0% risk of STD or unwanted pregnancy, plus you save money on dates and a hell of a lot of time.

--------------------------------
Also the poll here wasn't to understand the psychology of women....if it was it's the most retarded poll ever....because I didn't want girls to vote.

I was just trying to see if other guys are looking for the same basic type of girl I like....the answer was yes (so far)....actually the answer was I am an ignorant fuck and I should die IRL, but the 2nd place vote was in agreement with mine. That being the "cute" type....jeans and a T-shirt....in my mind quiet, easy going, smart, not afraid to get dirty or break her nails when camping etc...

Or as Ennia would put it "that dorky looking girl in the corner of the library with glasses on and nose burried in some book on cooking light."

Cali · Post by **Cali** » June 3, 2003, 6:50 pm

I feel somehow cheapened for reading this.

devereaux · Post by **devereaux** » June 3, 2003, 6:52 pm

Seriously doughboy, it's a desperate cry for help when you're making consecutive posts asking geeks who've never had a date in their life about what kind of girl they'd prefer to be with. STOP TRYING and join a matchmaking service or something. In case you haven't realized it, women control the world simply because of the veto power they hold over the penis. I'm only telling you this because I hate watching people embarass themselves. STOP EMBARASSING YOURSELF YOU FUCKEN TOOL!!!!

Lalanae · Post by **Lalanae** » June 3, 2003, 6:53 pm

Give it up Pils. You made a nonsensical poll and you can't recover. Just let it die.

Pilsburry · Post by **Pilsburry** » June 3, 2003, 7:06 pm

Cali, I don't mean to make you feel cheap I think you misinterpreted my statement somewhere....you know me better then a lot of the posters here.

Dev, It doesn't matter if they never had a date in thier life, I'm not asking for advice on how to get women....I'm asking what type of women they like. Why would if they ever got laid have anything to do with that?

Also why would I join a matchmaking service? You guys read too much into my posts, I would like a girlfriend...not a fuck buddy....but even that is not high priority in my life. I enjoy being single (well 95% of the time, sometime I get bored and would like to just have someone to sit and talk with..but for the most part I enjoy being able to live my life without worrying about other people).

Lal, if I cared what people thought of the poll I wouldn't have given a special option just so you could flame me, I did that so fuckheads wouldn't skew the results with thier opinion, I don't care about the fuckheads opinions...so I put a filter in

SUPRISE. OK, so who fell for the "fuckhead filter"? I would like to take this chance to thank you for not skewing my results.

I wanted honest answers from people who understood the concept of the poll.

Gaklek · Post by **Gaklek** » June 3, 2003, 8:04 pm

You are a sad sad little man.

Sirensa · Post by **Sirensa** » June 3, 2003, 8:11 pm

Pilsburry wrote:Also we had a poll about "what type of underwear do you find sexier?" a while back....if this is taken just at face value....why is this drawing more flames then that one? This is just generic regular clothes style.....not even underwear.

Easiest answer? I posted it.

Well actually the poll awhile back was what type of underwear do you prefer to wear - not what you find sexiest.

Honestly I think your poll would have come across better if you just left it at cute, beautiful, sexy, etc. without trying to stereotypically define them. And wtf wasn't there an option for "geeky"

Xaem · Post by **Xaem** » June 3, 2003, 8:15 pm

"Cute" and "Pretty" are pretty much synonyms. How about something worthwhile "Intelligence", Pilsburry you IGNORANT FUCK!!

Sargeras · Post by **Sargeras** » June 3, 2003, 8:24 pm

Dev is full of shit... I've been on plenty of dates!

Adelrune Argenti · Post by **Adelrune Argenti** » June 3, 2003, 8:45 pm

Acies wrote:Besides (hate to break this to you), while emotially sex is wonderful beyond words, physically I get more pleasure jacking off, and I am sure that is the case for 99% of guys.

This is certainly not the case for me.

noel · Post by **noel** » June 3, 2003, 8:59 pm

Adelrune Argenti wrote:
Acies wrote:Besides (hate to break this to you), while emotially sex is wonderful beyond words, physically I get more pleasure jacking off, and I am sure that is the case for 99% of guys.
This is certainly not the case for me.

Hahah Seconded.

This thread sucks!

murr · Post by **murr** » June 3, 2003, 9:04 pm

I voted for cute on initial instructions but then second description pretty wins out. Oh well.
Cute/pretty brunettes slay me.

Kylere · Post by **Kylere** » June 3, 2003, 9:07 pm

I prefer Bright as the first qualifier.

All the choices listed fade and go away.

Acies · Post by **Acies** » June 3, 2003, 9:38 pm

Aranuil wrote:
Adelrune Argenti wrote:
Acies wrote:Besides (hate to break this to you), while emotially sex is wonderful beyond words, physically I get more pleasure jacking off, and I am sure that is the case for 99% of guys.
This is certainly not the case for me.
Hahah Seconded.

This thread sucks!

pffft, you lie

Drolgin Steingrinder · Post by **Drolgin Steingrinder** » June 3, 2003, 9:39 pm

Besides (hate to break this to you), while emotially sex is wonderful beyond words, physically I get more pleasure jacking off, and I am sure that is the case for 99% of guys.

Six words for you:

YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG, SIR!

Adelrune Argenti · Post by **Adelrune Argenti** » June 3, 2003, 9:41 pm

Drolgin Steingrinder wrote:
Besides (hate to break this to you), while emotially sex is wonderful beyond words, physically I get more pleasure jacking off, and I am sure that is the case for 99% of guys.
Six words for you:

YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG, SIR!

Drolgin. Not just a pally dorf, also a sex therapist.

Kguku · Post by **Kguku** » June 3, 2003, 9:44 pm

I think that new avatar I found probably sums up what goes through Pillsbury's head when he gets snubbed by a woman. Which, with an attitude like his, is probably quite often.

Acies · Post by **Acies** » June 3, 2003, 10:02 pm

LOL, actually when I masturbate I know EXACTLY what I am doing, and I am quite familiar with what pleases me after years of experimentation. However, with a partner, the pure physical pleasure is not a constant due to obvious restrictions of always touching some area, not enough of others, etc.
However, I can believe that the majority of males here would be unfamiliar with their own bodies

Drolgin Steingrinder · Post by **Drolgin Steingrinder** » June 3, 2003, 10:12 pm

Allow me to expand:

When you say that masturbation is more enjoyable than sex, I can only go from the assumption that you are equating 'sex' with the sole act of penetration - and even then, in my opinion, there's no contest.

There's much more to sex than that, though... hell, some of my best sexual experiences have been situations where I did not come, but just enjoyed making my partner come. Does that qualify as having sex? In my mind, it does.

There's no doubt that being comfortable with the intimate details of your own body, and not being skittish about masturbation, can greatly enhance your sexlife, and if you are lucky, masturbating can be very good indeed, but claiming that anyone who prefers the intimate act of sex between two people to self-gratification has issues with or is unfamiliar with their own body is just ludicrous.

If you're extremely uncomfortable with your body, or your partner is, or either of you is just going for the fast climax, then yeah - masturbation might be more satisfying, but that leads me back to my post above: In that case, you are DOING IT WRONG, SIR!

VeeshanVault

Girl types....

Which type girl would you rather date?

Girl types....

Jesus Pils.