"Reuters admits altering Beirut photo." As John noted last night, the photographer whom Reuters credited on the photo is the same man who shot some of the famous propaganda images from Qana.
Helluva business opportunity right now for a company to provide simple factual news with no editorializing.
Truant wrote:Why? You'd just say it's biased because it's not reporting what you believe/want to hear.
No. Perhaps you are that stupid though. By the way, it's YOUR world they're fucking up. You may happen to agree with them now but that will change. Then you are screwed.
*~*stragi*~* wrote:god forbid someone alter the contrast of a photograph to make it more viewable.
REAL NEWS FROM WEBSITES WITH BANNERS CHALK FULL OF SHITTY LIGHTING ITT
This post makes it obvious you didn't bother to check out the photos in question. Good job looking like a moron. I have to work hard at it but you seem to pull it off quite easily.
Yes this is a retarded and completely unnecessary stunt to pull. Everyone knows Beirut is being bombed horrifically without some douchebag with photoshop turning this incident into a whipping stick for fuckwits like Metanis.
Nick wrote:Yes this is a retarded and completely unnecessary stunt to pull. Everyone knows Beirut is being bombed horrifically without some douchebag with photoshop turning this incident into a whipping stick for fuckwits like Metanis.
Well look on the bright side in about a month there will be no more Beruit. Then you can stop your bitching.
Nick, I took the liberty of forwarding your work samples to the Reuters Agency. I know they have a vacancy right now and you would appear to be a perfect candidate for the position.
That photographer has shit skills in Photoshop. He fucked up the clone tool in a big way...I can't believe with all of the hundreds and hundreds of photos that guy submitted to Reuters he never got caught...I mean seriously...look at that photo....he used the clone tool like my 2 year old daughter would if she tried. Sad
