Palin in 2012!

Post by **Sylvus** » December 1, 2009, 4:29 pm

This is great on so many levels. I'm having trouble determining if the people are stupid because they support Palin or because they're from Columbus, OH... it's hard to say!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKKKgua7 ... r_embedded

Too bad there aren't any conservatives left here to tell us if they think the people in the above video sound pretty reasonable or not.

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » December 1, 2009, 4:38 pm

Why the fuck wont she just go away? Seriously. I don't even see how she's a viable candidate. Mccain lost (votes if not the election itself) because of her. Not the other way around.

Gonzoie - Luclin · Post by **Gonzoie - Luclin** » December 1, 2009, 4:43 pm

I gotta give it to the man doing the interviews. I laughed several times at their answers and I don't know how he kept from laughing.

Hesten · Post by **Hesten** » December 1, 2009, 4:45 pm

Well, people can change....im sure she is not an absolute clueless fuckwith this time around.....

Post by **Sylvus** » December 1, 2009, 4:47 pm

He looked like he laughed one time, but caught himself fairly quickly. The woman around 1:56 in particular jumped out at me.

Little known fact: that guy in the Steelers jacket? Zamtuk.

masteen · Post by **masteen** » December 1, 2009, 5:31 pm

Neither Palin nor any of these fundylicious whackjobs are conservatives. They are Bible-beating liberals who've stolen my party from me.

Fairweather Pure · Post by **Fairweather Pure** » December 1, 2009, 5:47 pm

Damn you. I thought she really was running

Aabidano · Post by **Aabidano** » December 1, 2009, 6:21 pm

masteen wrote:Neither Palin nor any of these fundylicious whackjobs are conservatives. They are Bible-beating liberals who've stolen my party from me.

Yarp. Conservatism took a dive in 2000 that it hasn't recovered from.

*~*stragi*~* · Post by ***~*stragi*~*** » December 1, 2009, 7:08 pm

I like the conspiracy nut guy who looked like Sloth from The Goonies.

Spang · Post by **Spang** » December 2, 2009, 12:56 am

Drasta · Post by **Drasta** » December 6, 2009, 3:37 am

2012 ... palin .... maybe palin is how the world ends in 2012 ... damn that movie for lieing to us !

Nick · Post by **Nick** » December 7, 2009, 9:17 pm

No one else find the media more responsible for Palin related devotion than anything else?

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » December 8, 2009, 12:35 am

I did a GIS for "going rogue" in the hopes of finding a photoshop of Palin v's Paquin, instead I got:

Kwonryu DragonFist · Post by **Kwonryu DragonFist** » February 7, 2010, 8:54 pm

Palin and her cheat-notes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtcVMTZkTZQ

Hesten · Post by **Hesten** » February 8, 2010, 9:18 am

Kwonryu DragonFist wrote:Palin and her cheat-notes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtcVMTZkTZQ

Hey, cheap notes are ok, easy reminder.....what is NOT ok is bashing Obama for using teleprompter (like all presidents do, or in case of Bush, should have done to aviod messing up), and then showing she dont mind doing the same, but are too stupid to use a teleprompter and have to use hand notes

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » February 8, 2010, 5:26 pm

I only wish they had interviewed me for that clip "I thought $20 was a fair price to see if I could get a glimpse down her shirt while she was bending over to sign."

There are quite a few people who just need to disappear forever. Palin, Hitlery, Newt, John Kerry, Pelosi.....just put them in a van and drive it over the largest cliff you can find. We will all be better in the end.

Speaking of which....God is killing off lefties at a pretty good clip.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/08/ ... tml?hpt=T1

Xatrei · Post by **Xatrei** » February 8, 2010, 8:08 pm

Do you know how I know you're a fucking retard? You think Murtha was a leftie. If you could be bothered to actually look at his positions on abortion, gun control, energy, etc., you'd know that this guy, except for his stance on the war, was pretty much a moderate. Like most in congress, his biggest interest was bringing home bacon for his district so they'd keep sending his useless ass back to D.C. Given your self-identification as a right-leaning moderate, you shouldn't have had that many differences with this guy. Of course expecting you to actually consider inconvenient things like facts when they get in the way of the narrative you blindly accept is asking way too much.

If it wasn't for the fact that he's from a center-right district, I'd be glad that he's out of the way for a real "leftie," but instead that seat will go to another moderate or worse.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » February 8, 2010, 8:35 pm

I use lefty as a general term for any Democrat. I use Marxist and Socialist for those actually on the far left of the spectrum. Either way, that guy was one of the most corrupt pieces of shit to ever sit in Congress. Our country is better off with him gone and out of politics. All of those types are what precisely is wrong with our system and the more of them to drop (from both parties), the better off we will be in the long run.

Xatrei · Post by **Xatrei** » February 8, 2010, 10:26 pm

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:Our country is better off with him gone and out of politics. All of those types are what precisely is wrong with our system and the more of them to drop (from both parties), the better off we will be in the long run.

We can agree on this much. I won't say he was "one of the most corrupt" because they're nearly all a bunch of self-serving, corrupt trash, irrespective of which side of the aisle they park their asses. Our system is designed to promote exactly their sort of corrupt uselessness.

vn_Tanc · Post by **vn_Tanc** » February 9, 2010, 10:06 am

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:I use lefty as a general term for any Democrat. I use Marxist and Socialist for those actually on the far left of the spectrum.

Whereas if you use those words to mean the things everyone else understands them to mean you might find communication running a bit more smoothly.

Kwonryu DragonFist · February 10, 2010, 12:44 am

White House Hits Palin with Open Hand Slap

The White House Press Secretary just openly mocked Sarah Palin -- and he delivered the blow with the palm of his hand.

Robert Gibbs just addressed the media with a mini grocery list written on his hand -- plus two smart-ass additions: Eggs, Milk, Bread (which was crossed out), Hope, Change.

It's getting nasty in Washington, D.C. -- and we're not talking about the snow storm.

Looming over I-35 near Wyoming, Minn a billboard was put with a picture of George W. Bush asking Miss Me Yet?. People are still trying to find out who is behind the billboard, but imagine if it was Bush himself... I mean he has nothing better to do. Priceless.

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » February 10, 2010, 3:13 am

The hand thing is more funny than nasty if you ask me. However the billboard is just retarded.

Leonaerd · Post by **Leonaerd** » February 10, 2010, 4:07 am

I read a headline that said "Palin to Obama: Stop lecturing."

She's actually going to be President, isn't she?

Post by **Sylvus** » February 10, 2010, 11:53 am

Leonaerd wrote:She's actually going to be President, isn't she?

She's basically a less-intelligent, less-qualified, further-right Bush. I sure hope so!

Jice Virago · Post by **Jice Virago** » February 10, 2010, 1:22 pm

This would be funny if the mighty righties weren't all so stupid, making her a likely canidate. Mark my words, she is going to land the GOP nomination because of the T-Baggers she will bring in with her. These people actually worship stupidity and consider "intellectual" an insult. I can't see her winning over Obama, though, unless he bangs a white woman and Michelle hits him in the head with a putter and makes him crash his SUV.....

Siji · Post by **Siji** » February 10, 2010, 1:36 pm

My thought has always been that I hope she is the republican nominee. Obama and his team were overly nice to her during his campaign. I don't see that happening again. She's got enough shit in her closet that I think it would end up being a pretty good landslide.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » February 10, 2010, 3:15 pm

There is no way on earth that she gets the nomination. She might get the nom nom nom nom, but that is it. Even releasing a lesbian home video of her and Megan Fox would not be enough to get votes after seeing what happened the first go-round.

Jice Virago · Post by **Jice Virago** » February 10, 2010, 4:19 pm

If the GOP really wanted to move forward, Megan McCain is where they should start. I don't agree with her views on a lot of things, but shes at least reasonable and (more importantly) less than 100 years old.

Hesten · Post by **Hesten** » February 10, 2010, 4:34 pm

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:There is no way on earth that she gets the nomination. She might get the nom nom nom nom, but that is it. Even releasing a lesbian home video of her and Megan Fox would not be enough to get votes after seeing what happened the first go-round.

Lol, i would buy that

Aabidano · Post by **Aabidano** » February 10, 2010, 6:24 pm

Line To Meet Sarah Palin Goes Straight Through Mall Fountain

Midnyte_Ragebringer · February 12, 2010, 3:13 pm

I really hope she doesn't run for President. I enjoy her stance on many issues and I like looking at her, but she's a bit goofy for me.

Canelek · Post by **Canelek** » February 12, 2010, 3:17 pm

You guys are creeping me out. She is way too icky to blow a load over.

That said, I would likely watch a porn with her in it...but I would not be completely comfortable doing so.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » February 12, 2010, 3:29 pm

I know...you would be much more likely to enjoy a porn with Scott Brown.

Canelek · Post by **Canelek** » February 12, 2010, 4:03 pm

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:I know...you would be much more likely to enjoy a porn with Scott Brown.

I wouldn't dare break up your library. We'll watch it together sometime.

Leonaerd · Post by **Leonaerd** » February 13, 2010, 2:11 pm

I'd PILFer her drawers.

Kwonryu DragonFist · February 14, 2010, 12:24 am

Canelek wrote:You guys are creeping me out. She is way too icky to blow a load over.

That said, I would likely watch a porn with her in it...but I would not be completely comfortable doing so.

There's always the movie "Nailin' Palin".

Xyun · Post by **Xyun** » February 14, 2010, 4:40 am

I would be ecstatic if repubs are dumb enough to nominate her. wootski!

Spang · Post by **Spang** » February 14, 2010, 4:48 am

Unless someone runs against Obama, I plan on voting for Palin in the primaries.

Aslanna · Post by **Aslanna** » February 14, 2010, 5:59 am

Yeah there's no possible way that could backfire horribly.

Sueven · Post by **Sueven** » February 14, 2010, 3:46 pm

Jice wrote:If the GOP really wanted to move forward, Megan McCain is where they should start. I don't agree with her views on a lot of things, but shes at least reasonable and (more importantly) less than 100 years old.

Seriously? Sure, she's reasonable. But she has no experience, no policy knowledge, no nothing. Her greatest political moments are insulting Ann Coulter and defending her ass against accusations that it's fat. Her substantive credentials make Sarah Palin look like FDR.

The GOP has some reasonable, intellectually honest folks who are actually doing things of significance, some of whom are women. They could push those people instead of elevating some 20something woman who is known only because she landed a blog when her daddy ran for President.

Winnow · Post by **Winnow** » February 14, 2010, 7:25 pm

Jice Virago wrote:If the GOP really wanted to move forward, Megan McCain is where they should start. I don't agree with her views on a lot of things, but shes at least reasonable and (more importantly) less than 100 years old.

I did some research on Megan McCain's worthiness to be president:

http://thehiphopconsultant.wordpress.co ... he-a-slut/

use link above if the pics red-x

From her twitter page:

If Megan McCain was the one on the left, she would get my vote if she was able to name the first president of the United States.

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » February 14, 2010, 8:41 pm

“For years I have struggled to accept the fact that the way I look in a tank top comes off more ’sexual’ than a flat-chested woman. And once again I was reassured by the media that someone with my cup size should always be covered up. Or what, I’ll be seen as a slut?”

At least her struggle with reality is over. Now for the struggle with twinkies.

Jice Virago · Post by **Jice Virago** » February 15, 2010, 4:02 pm

Sueven wrote:
Jice wrote:If the GOP really wanted to move forward, Megan McCain is where they should start. I don't agree with her views on a lot of things, but shes at least reasonable and (more importantly) less than 100 years old.
Seriously? Sure, she's reasonable. But she has no experience, no policy knowledge, no nothing. Her greatest political moments are insulting Ann Coulter and defending her ass against accusations that it's fat. Her substantive credentials make Sarah Palin look like FDR.

The GOP has some reasonable, intellectually honest folks who are actually doing things of significance, some of whom are women. They could push those people instead of elevating some 20something woman who is known only because she landed a blog when her daddy ran for President.

I said START, not fucking President. And honestly, she IS more qualified than Palin in the same way anyone with a room tempurature IQ is more qualified than Palin. She is someone who should be getting cultivated for the future of the party, not Bobby Fucking Jindal. They need a younger person with common sense as a personality to represent the GOP to the younger crowd. Stick her in small office race and let her be a voice of reason in the party so people associate them with something other than self entitled rich white pricks.

There are, I am sure, capable pre-menopausal women in the GOP, but they are getting drowned in the sea of T-Bagger retardation. M.McCain has the advantage of being publicly known and publicly willing to have civil discourse with the left, so she has a chance of reigning in the crazy in the GOP. These unknown true conservatives that are languishing in the darkest corners of the GOP right now don't have enough pull to reign in the bullshit that has taken their party over, so in this case, being well known IS a qualification. Plus all the slobbering rednecks who fawned over Bible Spice Palin as jack off material would flock to her, too.

I might be talking out of my ass, but the fucking GOP is killing us right now. They need to get the Crazy under control by any means if the country is going to move forward, at all. We can't seriously evaluate the plutocratic bullshit that is going on while we have a bunch of crazed redneck racist idiots glomming all the attention away from it. The best way through that is if someone with some charisma and name recognition can force them down a more reasonable path. The Dems have had this issue, as well, but they have had their JFKs, Clintons, and Obamas shaking the establishment. At this point, with the latest supreme court rulling effectively handing over elections to megacorps, public recognition is the only way in the door.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » February 15, 2010, 8:54 pm

By the same token, the GOP had their Reagan. The right is not alone in needing to reign in the crazy. Pelosi and Reid are just as bad as the rabid right and neither is good the for the country. Just because one side goes nuts does not mean you have a complete polar shift to fix their damage when the other side comes to power. That is why the GOP is going to be taking more seats in the midterms....the Dems went nuts and stopped listening to the middle to push their own agenda instead of what their actual citizens wanted. They are supposed to be representatives and not idealists.

Jice Virago · Post by **Jice Virago** » February 15, 2010, 10:13 pm

You mean that part where the Dems let W fuck the consitution for 8 years with barely an ounce of dissent? And then when they got their asses roundly voted out they turned into the party of No! who voted against the stimulus while simultaneously grabbing all of it they could? Yeah I wouldn't drink too much of the Fox Cool Aid on this one.

Zaelath · Post by **Zaelath** » February 16, 2010, 3:01 am

I think you should rewrite that, unless "they" is supposed to mean the Dems...

I think you'll definitely see a swing against the Dems next election unless the GOP run a Palin/Bush (Jeb) ticket. But the likelihood is more that it will be an attempt to ensure the Government isn't actually capable of doing anything, by stacking the Senate with usual GOP retards that would vote against a war spending bill if the Dems proposed it, than a "backlash" against the swarthy Hawaiian.

The GOP and their media arm (FOX) seem to be able to pull off Orwellian rewrites of fact with monotonous regularity to about half the lower to middle classes, but it won't be enough to change the normal run of politics in 2 party systems:

- People don't like to vote out a government after one term.
- People like "checks and balances" in the form of splitting control of the house and senate.

Sueven · Post by **Sueven** » February 16, 2010, 10:15 am

Jice: 100% agree that the crazy needs to be reined in somehow. Also agree that the crazy is much more problematic on the right than the left at this point in time. I just think that if the only solution is starting to advance the career of Megan McCain-- a random 20something woman whose sole virtues are a famous father and a not-totally-unreasonable disposition-- then we're already fucked.

Kilmoll: Pelosi and Reid are in an entirely different class than Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, Jim DeMint, Tom Coburn, Michelle Bachmann, etc. Reid is a moderate/centrist Dem (who sometimes pushes a more liberal agenda because, you know, he's majority leader and has to represent his party) while Pelosi is a liberal Dem who still operates in a fact-based world of reality and argument. I guess you might be able to argue that she's comparable to a guy like Coburn-- she's close-- but she operates in a substantially more pragmatic and less ideological way than he does.

Nobody denies that there is crazy on the left. The difference is that guys like Dennis Kucinich and Michael Moore are fringe figures in the Democratic apparatus, while Beck and Limbaugh and DeMint and Bachmann and Palin are absolutely crucial figures on the right. The degree of influence that the crazy exerts in each party is not the same, at this point in time.

And arguing that the current Democratic establishment is pushing a radically far left / socialist agenda doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. They're seeking to address problems that are traditionally of concern to liberals, sure, like healthcare. But they're pursuing what are generally centrist, largely market-based solutions to address those problems.

Zamtuk · Post by **Zamtuk** » February 16, 2010, 12:06 pm

Just chiming in to reiterate that I fucking hate the Steelers, and would never be caught dead in any such apparel.

Kilmoll the Sexy · Post by **Kilmoll the Sexy** » February 16, 2010, 1:40 pm

Sueven wrote:Jice: 100% agree that the crazy needs to be reined in somehow. Also agree that the crazy is much more problematic on the right than the left at this point in time. I just think that if the only solution is starting to advance the career of Megan McCain-- a random 20something woman whose sole virtues are a famous father and a not-totally-unreasonable disposition-- then we're already fucked.

Kilmoll: Pelosi and Reid are in an entirely different class than Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, Jim DeMint, Tom Coburn, Michelle Bachmann, etc. Reid is a moderate/centrist Dem (who sometimes pushes a more liberal agenda because, you know, he's majority leader and has to represent his party) while Pelosi is a liberal Dem who still operates in a fact-based world of reality and argument. I guess you might be able to argue that she's comparable to a guy like Coburn-- she's close-- but she operates in a substantially more pragmatic and less ideological way than he does.

Nobody denies that there is crazy on the left. The difference is that guys like Dennis Kucinich and Michael Moore are fringe figures in the Democratic apparatus, while Beck and Limbaugh and DeMint and Bachmann and Palin are absolutely crucial figures on the right. The degree of influence that the crazy exerts in each party is not the same, at this point in time.

And arguing that the current Democratic establishment is pushing a radically far left / socialist agenda doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. They're seeking to address problems that are traditionally of concern to liberals, sure, like healthcare. But they're pursuing what are generally centrist, largely market-based solutions to address those problems.

Is the government bailing out certain businesses in a free market centrist or is it government interceding in too much? Big government is bad...and this administration has taken it to historic levels.

miir · Post by **miir** » February 16, 2010, 2:47 pm

Kilmoll the Sexy wrote:Is the government bailing out certain businesses in a free market centrist or is it government interceding in too much?

Are you talking about the Bush bailout or the Obama bailout?