Some EQ2 Beta Picts (bandwidth intensive)
Some EQ2 Beta Picts (bandwidth intensive)
Here's some of the Screens I took the first few weeks of beta.
Birdies!
Buildings that aren't warped and cartoonish!
Cows!
Pwning a Gruttooth Runt on newbie island:
Can't resist the Rat!
Not all blondes:
Hot cow herder:
Combat in the rain:
Flying on a gryphon thingy. Weeee!
More combat in the rain:
Cat scared the shit out of me. Bad cat! Bad!
Rat pack and a Veeshan Vaulter
Sneaking up on a bambi in stealth mode:
Birdies!
Buildings that aren't warped and cartoonish!
Cows!
Pwning a Gruttooth Runt on newbie island:
Can't resist the Rat!
Not all blondes:
Hot cow herder:
Combat in the rain:
Flying on a gryphon thingy. Weeee!
More combat in the rain:
Cat scared the shit out of me. Bad cat! Bad!
Rat pack and a Veeshan Vaulter
Sneaking up on a bambi in stealth mode:
Aesthetically pleasing to one person may not be to another. While running around the WoW beta, it was worse looking to me even if you like cartoons or wish to be in Who Framed Roger Rabbit. What playable massive online game graphics do you like better? Lineage 2 looks better but I think EQ2 plays better.Xouqoa wrote:Those graphics are just terribly unimpressive, in my opinion.
Screens don't do any game justice but you need to play the games to know that. I'd guess massive beta invites will come out soon.
- Akaran_D
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 4151
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 2:38 pm
- Location: Somewhere in my head...
- Contact:
That just looks f'ing impressive.
Sorry Xou, but you're blind.
Sorry Xou, but you're blind.
Akaran of Mistmoore, formerly Akaran of Veeshan
I know I'm good at what I do, but I know I'm not the best.
But I guess that on the other hand, I could be like the rest.
I know I'm good at what I do, but I know I'm not the best.
But I guess that on the other hand, I could be like the rest.
That's about all you can say. I've seen DAoC, Lineage 2 (my favorite for character design and animation), WoW, FFXI, CoH, SWG, etc. all in game. EQ2 has the best effects from atmosphere, spells, weather, audio, etc. The UI, gameplay, quests, etc are well done. It's worth a look if you get into Beta.Rellix wrote:The pictures don't do it justice.
- Keverian FireCry
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 2919
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 6:41 pm
- Gender: Mangina
- Location: Seattle, WA
Looks ugly to me, the graphics are high polygon, but something is wrong with them and I can't quite place it. It just looks really bland. They need some artistic style to it like WoW. Seems like they could have done a lot better with such a strong graphics engine. The human faces...look horrible, guess they hired the same modelers they had for Luclin.
- Xanastik Fox
- Gets Around
- Posts: 54
- Joined: October 28, 2002, 11:03 pm
- Animalor
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 5902
- Joined: July 8, 2002, 12:03 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Anirask
- PSN ID: Anirask
- Location: Canada
I find that the color palette they used is extremely bland and doesn't instill a sense of life into the game. Stuff just looks very generic in most of those screenies.
Compare it to stuff like Redridge
http://worldofwarcraft.com/screenshots/ ... x=25&Set=0
Or what you see on the screen when you're dead and in ghost mode running to your corpse
http://worldofwarcraft.com/screenshots/ ... x=22&Set=0
Or Feralas
http://worldofwarcraft.com/screenshots/ ... x=20&Set=0
I find that the World that Blizzard crafted, even though they don't aim at realism, looks very much alive. Colors are vibrant when they need to be and very much gloomy when they need it.
I won't judge EQ2 more than that without playing it however it'll take something REALLY special to dislodge WoW, and I've been playing it for over a year already.
Compare it to stuff like Redridge
http://worldofwarcraft.com/screenshots/ ... x=25&Set=0
Or what you see on the screen when you're dead and in ghost mode running to your corpse
http://worldofwarcraft.com/screenshots/ ... x=22&Set=0
Or Feralas
http://worldofwarcraft.com/screenshots/ ... x=20&Set=0
I find that the World that Blizzard crafted, even though they don't aim at realism, looks very much alive. Colors are vibrant when they need to be and very much gloomy when they need it.
I won't judge EQ2 more than that without playing it however it'll take something REALLY special to dislodge WoW, and I've been playing it for over a year already.
1280X1024 with average settings that would work on an ATI 9700 128 card.Xanastik Fox wrote:What resolution and graphics settings was the PC running on when you took them?
max settings everything looks good, but it lags a lot.
The second shot has shadows enabled. The rest of the screens would look even better if I had the settings on high.
Aye, shadows and flora make a positive impact on scenery and graphics. The only flora/shadow example in my screens is the second picture I posted. Judge by that one the quality of EQ if you have a good card.Neroon wrote:One thing to mention, he doesn't have flora on. It is system intensive, but makes a world of difference. I would go as far as to say it looks entirely different.
This one:
- Xouqoa
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 4103
- Joined: July 2, 2002, 5:49 pm
- Gender: Mangina
- XBL Gamertag: Xouqoa
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
I think some of the scenery models (like the city in that last screenshot) look pretty nice, but the character models overall are... off. I'm not sure what it is about them. Too plasticy? The gal in that last screenshot looks like a real doll walking around. =\ I think they went for a realism effect and it just doesn't look realistic to me.
But hey, to each their own. If there is an open beta for EQ2 I might check it out, but I really doubt I'll be buying it or playing it.
But hey, to each their own. If there is an open beta for EQ2 I might check it out, but I really doubt I'll be buying it or playing it.
"Our problems are man-made, therefore they may be solved by man. No problem of human destiny is beyond human beings." - John F Kennedy
- Rivera Bladestrike
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: September 15, 2002, 4:55 pm
Rats milk!
My name is (removed to protect dolphinlovers)
Rivera / Shiezer - EQ (Retired)
What I Am Listening To
Rivera / Shiezer - EQ (Retired)
What I Am Listening To
- Dregor Thule
- Super Poster!
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 8:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: Xathlak
- PSN ID: dregor77
- Location: Oakville, Ontario
-
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 3871
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 1:59 pm
- Gender: Male
- XBL Gamertag: kimj0ngil
- Location: Ahwatukee, Arizona
- Contact:
It is all in the eyes of the beholder. Personally, to me the EQ2 graphics are a hundred times better than WoW graphics. Other people will say the other way around. No real reason to argue about it, nobody will change their mind.
That said, it isn't the graphics that will keep me from playing WoW. It was just.. boringly easy.
That said, it isn't the graphics that will keep me from playing WoW. It was just.. boringly easy.
- Keverian FireCry
- Way too much time!
- Posts: 2919
- Joined: July 3, 2002, 6:41 pm
- Gender: Mangina
- Location: Seattle, WA
I agree and I LOVE where Thousand Needles meets with Feralas, it fades from brilliant red rock canyon into a lush jungle. I was only in stress test and I was not high enough level to explore a lot, but it was deffinately one of the more amazing zones I got to see. I also really like the eerie zones with dark/haunted forests like Darkshore or Felwood. They are incredibly immersive and creepy, especially when everything around you is a ??? con.Feralas is the best looking area I have ever seen in any game. It is seriously beautiful.. and the coastline near the desolace/feralas border with the giant tidehunters is also really pretty.